Staples, Inc. - Scheduling Order
The Tribunal accepted the parties' agreed timetable as appropriate and consistent with the Competition Tribunal Act and ordered the detailed schedule for disclosures, discovery, expert exchanges, mediation and a 24‑day hearing commencing February 6, 2017, with chess clock timing totalling 108 hours.
- Citation
- 2016 Comp Trib 4
- Parties
- Applicant: Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Staples, Inc.; Respondent: Staples AMS, Inc.; Respondent: Office Depot, Inc.
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S.92 of the Competition Act (merger) / Scheduling Order (pre Hearing / Case Management)
- Outcome
- Scheduling order issued approving the parties' proposed timetable and fixing pre-hearing deadlines and hearing dates.
- Legal Topics
- Pre Hearing Scheduling, Section 92 Application, Discovery and Affidavits of Documents, Expert Evidence Deadlines, Use of Chess Clock Timing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Competition
Applicant
Staples, Inc.
Respondent
Staples AMS, Inc.
Respondent
Office Depot, Inc.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under S.92 of the Competition Act (merger) / Scheduling Order (pre Hearing / Case Management)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed timetable is appropriate and consistent with subsection 9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act
- 2 Setting detailed pre-hearing and hearing schedules for a s.92 merger application
- 3 Allocation and procedure for expert reports and discovery
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal accepted the parties' agreed timetable as appropriate and consistent with the Competition Tribunal Act and ordered the detailed schedule for disclosures, discovery, expert exchanges, mediation and a 24‑day hearing commencing February 6, 2017, with chess clock timing totalling 108 hours.
Court Disposition
Scheduling order issued approving the parties' proposed timetable and fixing pre-hearing deadlines and hearing dates.
Orders
- Approve and adopt the agreed timetable for pre-hearing steps as set out in the order.
- Service of affidavits of documents and delivery of documents by all parties due April 14, 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment