McMullin v. Nova Scotia Steel & Coal Co.
Majority held that s.251 of the Nova Scotia Railway Act applied to persons lawfully on the track including company workmen and imposed an absolute duty on the company to station a person on the last car to warn persons; the company breached that statutory duty (no person was stationed and bell was inoperative) and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- (1907) 39 SCR 593
- Parties
- Appellants (plaintiffs): Elizabeth McMullin and Others; Respondents (defendants): The Nova Scotia Steel and Coal Company
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Tort (wrongful Death/negligence) / Appeal From the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia to the Supreme Court of Canada; Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment of the trial court restored in favour of the plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Common Employment Doctrine, Employer's Liability, Statutory Duty to Warn, Contributory Negligence, Fatal Injuries Act (lord Campbell's Act), Railway Safety Regulation
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth McMullin and Others
Appellants (plaintiffs)
The Nova Scotia Steel and Coal Company
Respondents (defendants)
Procedural Posture
Tort (wrongful Death/negligence) / Appeal From the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia to the Supreme Court of Canada; Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.251 of the Nova Scotia Railway Act applies to servants/employees as well as the public
- 2 Whether statutory duty to station a person on the last car is an absolute duty rendering the company liable notwithstanding fellow-servant negligence
- 3 Whether the doctrine of common employment bars recovery or whether Employers' Liability Act/Fatal Injuries Act provide recovery
Ratio Decidendi
Majority held that s.251 of the Nova Scotia Railway Act applied to persons lawfully on the track including company workmen and imposed an absolute duty on the company to station a person on the last car to warn persons; the company breached that statutory duty (no person was stationed and bell was inoperative) and therefore was liable notwithstanding the fact that the immediate omission involved fellow servants; appeal allowed and trial judgment restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment of the trial court restored in favour of the plaintiffs.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Judgment of trial judge restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment