Rogers Communications Partnership v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada
The internet transmission of ringtone files is a reproduction/download and not a communication of a musical work to the public under s 3(1)(f); nonetheless the Copyright Board validly certified Tariff 24 and its decision was not beyond jurisdiction; the plaintiffs are not precluded by res judicata or by their 2010 agreement from litigating repayment; SOCAN was not unjustly enriched because tariff payments were made under a valid Board-certified tariff until Supreme Court decisions put the tariff's legal foundation in serious doubt and plaintiffs ceased payments; no tracing order is warranted.
- Citation
- 2015 FC 286
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Rogers Communications Partnership; Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Telus Communications Company; Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Bell Mobility Inc.; Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim: Quebecor Media Inc.; Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN)
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Motion for Declaratory Relief Regarding Validity and Enforcement of Copyright Board Tariff / Decision on Motion (order and Reasons)
- Outcome
- Declarations issued answering six posed legal questions in favour of plaintiffs on some points and defendants on others; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Communication to the Public, Copyright Tariffs, Jurisdiction of the Copyright Board, Res Judicata, Estoppel, Unjust Enrichment, Tracing Orders, Technological Neutrality
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rogers Communications Partnership
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
Telus Communications Company
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
Bell Mobility Inc.
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
Quebecor Media Inc.
Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN)
Defendant / Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Motion for Declaratory Relief Regarding Validity and Enforcement of Copyright Board Tariff / Decision on Motion (order and Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether internet transmission of ringtone file constitutes communication of a musical work to the public by telecommunication under s 3(1)(f) of the Copyright Act
- 2 Whether the Copyright Board had jurisdiction to certify Tariff 24 (ringtones) for 2003-2005 and 2006-2013
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs' claim is barred by res judicata
Ratio Decidendi
The internet transmission of ringtone files is a reproduction/download and not a communication of a musical work to the public under s 3(1)(f); nonetheless the Copyright Board validly certified Tariff 24 and its decision was not beyond jurisdiction; the plaintiffs are not precluded by res judicata or by their 2010 agreement from litigating repayment; SOCAN was not unjustly enriched because tariff payments were made under a valid Board-certified tariff until Supreme Court decisions put the tariff's legal foundation in serious doubt and plaintiffs ceased payments; no tracing order is warranted.
Court Disposition
Declarations issued answering six posed legal questions in favour of plaintiffs on some points and defendants on others; no order as to costs
Orders
- The plaintiffs’ claim has not been finally decided against them.
- The 2010 agreement between the plaintiffs and SOCAN does not prevent them from claiming the relief they seek.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment