Stuart v. The King
Payment by the Crown to discharge a mortgage on certain lots satisfies claims of the mortgagee for those mortgaged lots but cannot be applied toward compensation for a separately owned lot not covered by that mortgage (lot 149); matter remitted to Exchequer Court to determine compensation for lot 149.
- Citation
- [1926] SCR 284
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Roland Stuart; Respondent/plaintiff: His Majesty The King
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 1926
- Procedural Posture
- Expropriation Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Exchequer Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; remitted to the Exchequer Court to determine compensation for lot 149; no costs of this appeal ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation, Mortgage Payment, Statutory Procedure, Valuation, Compulsory Taking
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roland Stuart
Appellant/defendant
His Majesty The King
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Expropriation Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada / On Appeal From the Exchequer Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payment by the Crown to a mortgagee can be applied as compensation for a separately owned lot not covered by that mortgage
- 2 Whether the Crown's advance payment of the amount it tendered discharged the owner's claim for part of the compensation
- 3 Whether trial valuation of the property should be disturbed on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Payment by the Crown to discharge a mortgage on certain lots satisfies claims of the mortgagee for those mortgaged lots but cannot be applied toward compensation for a separately owned lot not covered by that mortgage (lot 149); matter remitted to Exchequer Court to determine compensation for lot 149.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; remitted to the Exchequer Court to determine compensation for lot 149; no costs of this appeal ordered.
Orders
- Appeal allowed in part and action remitted to the Exchequer Court to determine amount of compensation payable in respect of lot 149.
- No order as to costs of the appeal; costs of proceedings in the Exchequer Court to be in the discretion of the judge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment