Black v. Canada
The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Tax Court's interpretation that the Minister may assess the appellant as a resident of Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act despite the Convention deeming him a United Kingdom resident and that Article 27(2) applies so as to permit taxation of the appellant's non-United...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2014 FCA 275
- Parties
- Appellant: Conrad M. Black; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Final Appeal Decision (federal Court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Residency for Tax Purposes, Canada United Kingdom Tax Convention 1978, Article 27(2), Tax Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conrad M. Black
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Final Appeal Decision (federal Court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister may assess tax on the appellant as a resident of Canada under the Income Tax Act despite the appellant being deemed resident of the United Kingdom under the Canada-United Kingdom Tax Convention (1978)
- 2 Whether Article 27(2) of the Convention permits Canada to tax the appellant's non-United Kingdom (worldwide) income and not solely income arising in Canada
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Tax Court's interpretation that the Minister may assess the appellant as a resident of Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act despite the Convention deeming him a United Kingdom resident and that Article 27(2) applies so as to permit taxation of the appellant's non-United Kingdom income as determined by the Tax Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs to respondent in this Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Black v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2014-11-26 Neutral citation 2014 FCA 275 File numbers A-70-14 Decision Content Date: 20141126 Docket: A-70-14 Citation: 2014 FCA 275 CORAM: DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. NEAR J.A. BETWEEN: CONRAD M. BLACK Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 26, 2014. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 26, 2014. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DAWSON J.A. Date: 20141126 Docket: A-70-14 Citation: 2014 FCA 275 CORAM: DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. NEAR J.A. BETWEEN: CONRAD M. BLACK Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 26, 2014) DAWSON J.A. [1] In thoughtful and comprehensive reasons cited as 2014 TCC 12, Chief Justice Rip of the Tax Court of Canada determined that the Minister of National Revenue may assess tax against the appellant in respect of certain specifically enumerated items of income on the basis that the appellant was a resident of Canada for the purposes of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) (Act). [2] This is an appeal from that decision. [3] Two issues are raised in this appeal. The primary issue is whether the Tax Court correctly determined that although the appellant was deemed to be a resident of the United Kingdom under the Canada-United Kingdom Tax Convention (1978) (Convention), the Minister could assess tax on the basis that the appellant was a resident of Canada for the purposes of the Act. [4] The second issue is whether the Tax Court correctly determined that Article 27(2) of the Convention applied so as to permit the Minister to tax the appellant's non-United Kingdom income, not just the appellant's income that arose in Canada. [5] In our view, Chief Justice Rip made no error in his interpretation of the Convention. We reach this conclusion substantially for the reasons given by him. [6] It follows that the appeal will be dismissed with costs in this Court “Eleanor R. Dawson” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: A-70-14 APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. CHIEF JUSTICE RIP OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA, DATED JANUARY 14, 2014 IN FILE NO. 2008-2896(IT)G. STYLE OF CAUSE: CONRAD M. BLACK v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: November 26, 2014 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. NEAR J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: DAWSON J.A. APPEARANCES: David C. Nathanson Adrienne Woodyard For The Appellant Arnold H. Bornstein Diana Aird For The RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Davis LLP Toronto, Ontario For The Appellant William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The respondent