Oshawa (City) v. Brennan Paving Co.
When a contract conditions payment on an engineer's certificate but the engineer abandons the contractual method of measurement or refuses to certify and the employer concurs or acquiesces, the requirement of possession of that certificate is excused and the court will determine entitlement; however, recovery for quantities supplied in excess of an express estimate remains barred absent the engineer's written order authorizing the excess.
- Citation
- [1955] SCR 76
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Corporation of the City of Oshawa; Plaintiff/respondent: Brennan Paving Company Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 1954
- Procedural Posture
- Contract / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction Contract Interpretation, Condition Precedent to Payment, Engineer's Certificate, Acquiescence/estoppel, Measurement and Payment by Weight
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corporation of the City of Oshawa
Defendant/appellant
Brennan Paving Company Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Contract / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an engineer's failure to certify as required by the contract bars contractor recovery
- 2 Whether employer's concurrence in the engineer's departure from contract certification absolves contractor from the certificate requirement
- 3 Whether quantities in excess of an estimate require a written order from the engineer to be recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
When a contract conditions payment on an engineer's certificate but the engineer abandons the contractual method of measurement or refuses to certify and the employer concurs or acquiesces, the requirement of possession of that certificate is excused and the court will determine entitlement; however, recovery for quantities supplied in excess of an express estimate remains barred absent the engineer's written order authorizing the excess.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario affirmed subject to variation by deducting $1,305.02 (value of 160.125 tons of asphalt supplied in excess of the estimate)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment