Schoeber (Re)
The petition was dismissed because it lacked any legal validity, constituted OPCA litigation that could not be cured by amendment, and raised concerns about improper notarization that warranted referral to professional regulators.
- Citation
- 2018 BCSC 1528
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rodger Andreas Schoeber
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Petition (supreme Court of British Columbia) / In Chambers Hearing Petition Dismissed
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed; court to retain the petition file and refer matters to regulators.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Equitable Tracing, OPCA (organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments) Litigation, Frivolous and Vexatious Litigation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rodger Andreas Schoeber
Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Petition (supreme Court of British Columbia) / In Chambers Hearing Petition Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition seeking declaration of sole party in interest and remedies in equity has legal validity
- 2 Whether the petition constitutes OPCA litigation and is incurable by amendment
- 3 Whether notaries public improperly lent legitimacy to the documents by notarization
Ratio Decidendi
The petition was dismissed because it lacked any legal validity, constituted OPCA litigation that could not be cured by amendment, and raised concerns about improper notarization that warranted referral to professional regulators.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed; court to retain the petition file and refer matters to regulators.
Orders
- Petition dismissed
- Court will retain the petition file
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment