Wood v. Ho
Because the solicitor failed to provide a timely, reasoned written analysis to overcome clear retainer/language misunderstandings and deprived the clients of counsel of their choice at trial, the registrar disallowed solicitor's fees, taxes and disbursements incurred from the first day of trial onward, reduced...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2001 BCSC 705
- Parties
- Solicitor: Epstein Wood; Client: John Ho; Client: Quon Chow
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Solicitor's Bill Review (legal Profession Act) / Registrar Review (master Barber)
- Outcome
- Partial allowance of accounts; fees disallowed from first day of trial onwards; pre-trial fees allowed in reduced amounts; solicitor ordered to refund excess payments and clients awarded costs of the review.
- Legal Topics
- Contingency Fee, Retainer Agreement, Reasonable Fees, Right to Counsel of Choice, Costs Assessment, Qualified Privilege, Written Opinion to Client
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Epstein Wood
Solicitor
John Ho
Client
Quon Chow
Client
Procedural Posture
Solicitor's Bill Review (legal Profession Act) / Registrar Review (master Barber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether solicitor's bills were excessive or improperly billed from start of trial
- 2 Whether solicitor failed to provide reasoned written advice to clients given language/retainer misunderstandings
- 3 Whether clients were deprived of counsel of their choice at trial (Irvin/Irvin Epstein, Q.C.)
Ratio Decidendi
Because the solicitor failed to provide a timely, reasoned written analysis to overcome clear retainer/language misunderstandings and deprived the clients of counsel of their choice at trial, the registrar disallowed solicitor's fees, taxes and disbursements incurred from the first day of trial onward, reduced pre-trial accounts to specified amounts and ordered a refund to the clients.
Court Disposition
Partial allowance of accounts; fees disallowed from first day of trial onwards; pre-trial fees allowed in reduced amounts; solicitor ordered to refund excess payments and clients awarded costs of the review.
Orders
- Solicitor's fees, taxes and disbursements disallowed from first day of trial (October 18, 1999) onwards
- Allowed fees and disbursements total $27,220.30
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment