Hunter-Rutland Inc. v. Huntsville (Town)

Hunter-Rutland Inc. v. Huntsville (Town)

The appeal was dismissed because the motion judge properly exercised his power to grant summary judgment for HRI; the cause of action was discovered only when HRI learned of the sale so the limitation period had not expired; and even if title had passed to the Town under the lease, the Town was obliged to apply the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2015 ONCA 353
Parties
Respondent (plaintiff): Hunter-Rutland Inc.; Appellant (defendant): The Corporation of the Town of Huntsville
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; summary judgment for Hunter-Rutland Inc. upheld.
Legal Topics
Conversion, Negligence, Limitation Period (discovery), Summary Judgment Procedure, Commercial Tenancies (sale of Tenant's Goods)
Source Language
english
Commercial Law Tort Civil Procedure Property Law Conversion Negligence Limitation Period (discovery) Summary Judgment Procedure +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hunter-Rutland Inc.

Respondent (plaintiff)

The Corporation of the Town of Huntsville

Appellant (defendant)

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From Summary Judgment (court of Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Power of a motion judge to grant judgment for or against the non-moving party on summary judgment
  2. 2 When a cause of action is discovered for limitation purposes (discovery rule)
  3. 3 Whether lease terms (clause 6.2 and 10.10) affect ownership and application of sale proceeds

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the motion judge properly exercised his power to grant summary judgment for HRI; the cause of action was discovered only when HRI learned of the sale so the limitation period had not expired; and even if title had passed to the Town under the lease, the Town was obliged to apply the proceeds to rent arrears and to sell at a reasonable price under s.53 of the Commercial Tenancies Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summary judgment for Hunter-Rutland Inc. upheld.

Orders

  • Summary judgment granted for respondent Hunter-Rutland Inc.; damages to be assessed under Rule 20.05 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • Costs of the appeal awarded to Hunter-Rutland Inc. in the agreed amount of $13,500 inclusive of disbursements and HST.