Smith v. Shanklin
Given the evidence of fraud and the existence of a confidential relationship without independent legal advice, the conveyance was properly set aside; the Appellate Division correctly affirmed the trial judge and the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed.
- Citation
- [1933] SCR 340
- Parties
- Respondent (executor of G. W. Shanklin and Plaintiff): Smith; Appellant (grantee/defendant): Shanklin
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 1933
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal; Property/conveyance Dispute Alleging Fraud in Execution / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Appellate Division of New Brunswick; Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; conveyance set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Conveyance, Fraud in Execution, Confidential Relationship, Independent Legal Advice, Setting Aside Transactions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smith
Respondent (executor of G. W. Shanklin and Plaintiff)
Shanklin
Appellant (grantee/defendant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal; Property/conveyance Dispute Alleging Fraud in Execution / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Appellate Division of New Brunswick; Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conveyance was obtained by fraud
- 2 Whether a confidential relationship required independent advice to validate the conveyance
- 3 Whether appellate court erred in affirming trial judge's setting aside of the conveyance
Ratio Decidendi
Given the evidence of fraud and the existence of a confidential relationship without independent legal advice, the conveyance was properly set aside; the Appellate Division correctly affirmed the trial judge and the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; conveyance set aside.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Conveyance set aside (judgment of trial judge affirmed by Appellate Division).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment