MB9-11104
Lebanon is a country of reference because under Lebanese law the appellants have an automatic right to Lebanese nationality through a Lebanese father/grandfather; appellants did not prove on a balance of probabilities a significant impediment nor that they made reasonable efforts to obtain the required formalities (despite embassy guidance and available procedural avenues); they did not establish a personalized risk of persecution in Lebanon; procedural fairness and impartiality were not breached. Therefore the RPD's rejection of the refugee claims was correct and is confirmed.
- Citation
- MB9-11104
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Adult Daughter (appellant): XXXX XXXX XXXX; Minor Children (appellants): XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal From Refugee Protection Division Decision / Final Decision at Refugee Appeal Division (reasons and Dismissal)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division dated April 25, 2019 confirmed by RAD
- Legal Topics
- Country of Reference, Acquisition of Nationality, Procedural Fairness, Bias, Admissibility of New Evidence, Standard of Review, Gender Related Persecution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Adult Daughter (appellant)
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX; XXXX XXXX XXXX
Minor Children (appellants)
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal From Refugee Protection Division Decision / Final Decision at Refugee Appeal Division (reasons and Dismissal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the RPD breached rules of natural justice or demonstrated bias
- 2 Whether Lebanon is a country of reference for the appellants
- 3 Whether appellants made reasonable efforts to acquire Lebanese nationality or face significant impediments
Ratio Decidendi
Lebanon is a country of reference because under Lebanese law the appellants have an automatic right to Lebanese nationality through a Lebanese father/grandfather; appellants did not prove on a balance of probabilities a significant impediment nor that they made reasonable efforts to obtain the required formalities (despite embassy guidance and available procedural avenues); they did not establish a personalized risk of persecution in Lebanon; procedural fairness and impartiality were not breached. Therefore the RPD's rejection of the refugee claims was correct and is confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division dated April 25, 2019 confirmed by RAD
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- Decision of the Refugee Protection Division of April 25, 2019 is confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment