R. v. Taylor
The motion for leave to appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to satisfy the R. v. R.(R.) test; none of the grounds raised warranted granting leave.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2011 ONCA 681
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Craig Taylor
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Motion for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Motion for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, R. V. R.(r.) Test, Acquittal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Craig Taylor
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Motion for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the R. v. R.(R.) test was met to grant leave to appeal
- 2 Whether the grounds raised by the appellant warranted granting leave to appeal the acquittal
Ratio Decidendi
The motion for leave to appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to satisfy the R. v. R.(R.) test; none of the grounds raised warranted granting leave.
Court Disposition
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Motion for leave to appeal is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Taylor Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2011-11-02 Neutral citation 2011 ONCA 681 Docket numbers C52764 Judges Laskin, John Ivan; Cronk, Eleanore Ann; Blair, Robert Ashley Subject Criminal Decision Content CITATION: R. v. Taylor, 2011 ONCA 681 DATE: 20111102 DOCKET: C52764 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Laskin, Cronk and Blair JJ.A. BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen Respondent and Craig Taylor Appellant Michael J.N. Haraschuk, for the appellant Emile Carrington, for the respondent Heard: October 31, 2011 On appeal from the decision of the Summary Conviction Appeal Court dated September 7, 2010 by Justice Patricia C. Hennessy of the Superior Court of Justice, allowing the appeal from the acquittal entered on July 20, 2009 by Justice Malcolm McLeod of the Ontario Court of Justice. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We are not satisfied that the test in R. v. R.(R.) (2008), 234 C.C.C. (3d) 463 (Ont. C.A.) has been met. None of the grounds the appellant raises warrants granting leave. [2] The motion for leave to appeal is dismissed.