MB3-04952
The RAD allowed the appeal because the RPD unreasonably failed to consider a material piece of documentary evidence (the appellant's mother's letter alleging spells/voodoo caused the father's death) and did not adequately assess the issue of sincerity regarding belief in witchcraft; that omission undermined the RPD's central finding that the appellant faced no real risk, so the RPD decision was set aside and the claim referred to a differently constituted panel for redetermination (the RAD cannot substitute its own credibility determination without a hearing).
- Citation
- MB3-04952
- Parties
- Person Who Is the Subject of the Appeal (appellant): XXXX XXXX XXXX; Intervenor / Respondent: Minister of Public Safety Canada
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal (rad Review of RPD Decision) / Decision on Appeal (appeal Allowed; Matter Referred for Redetermination)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; RPD determination set aside and matter referred for re-determination by a differently constituted panel
- Legal Topics
- Credibility Assessment, Admissibility of Evidence on Appeal (s.110(4) Irpa), Standard of Review and Deference, Remedy — Referral for Redetermination, State Protection and Internal Flight Alternative, Claims Based on Witchcraft
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Person Who Is the Subject of the Appeal (appellant)
Minister of Public Safety Canada
Intervenor / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal (rad Review of RPD Decision) / Decision on Appeal (appeal Allowed; Matter Referred for Redetermination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the RPD erred in its credibility assessment regarding witchcraft allegations and failed to assess sincerity
- 2 Whether documents submitted on appeal were admissible under s.110(4) IRPA
- 3 Whether the RAD should hold a hearing under s.110(6) IRPA
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD allowed the appeal because the RPD unreasonably failed to consider a material piece of documentary evidence (the appellant's mother's letter alleging spells/voodoo caused the father's death) and did not adequately assess the issue of sincerity regarding belief in witchcraft; that omission undermined the RPD's central finding that the appellant faced no real risk, so the RPD decision was set aside and the claim referred to a differently constituted panel for redetermination (the RAD cannot substitute its own credibility determination without a hearing).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; RPD determination set aside and matter referred for re-determination by a differently constituted panel
Orders
- Set aside the Refugee Protection Division decision rejecting the claim
- Refer the matter to a differently constituted RPD panel for re-determination of the refugee protection claim having regard to the totality of the evidence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment