Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust v. Davidson
The order dismissing the application to set aside the default judgment was final for purposes of appeal because it finally disposed of the parties' rights in the Supreme Court (the appellant became liable for $300,000 plus costs) and the default judgment only became final for appeal purposes once the Rule 17(12)...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2002 BCCA 66
- Parties
- Plaintiff (respondent): Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust; Defendant (appellant): Robin Davidson; Defendant: Curtis Hall
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Order Dismissing Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Applications for Directions on Whether Leave Required and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Appeal; Appeal Set for Hearing
- Outcome
- Respondent's application to dismiss the appeal for failure to obtain leave dismissed; appeal may proceed to hearing; appellant awarded costs for applications
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Setting Aside Default Judgment, Interlocutory Vs Final Order, Leave to Appeal
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morguard Real Estate Investment Trust
Plaintiff (respondent)
Robin Davidson
Defendant (appellant)
Curtis Hall
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Order Dismissing Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Applications for Directions on Whether Leave Required and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Appeal; Appeal Set for Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order dismissing an application to set aside a default judgment is interlocutory or final for the purposes of s.7 of the Court of Appeal Act
- 2 Whether leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was required
Ratio Decidendi
The order dismissing the application to set aside the default judgment was final for purposes of appeal because it finally disposed of the parties' rights in the Supreme Court (the appellant became liable for $300,000 plus costs) and the default judgment only became final for appeal purposes once the Rule 17(12) remedy was exhausted; consequently leave to appeal was not required and the appeal was properly commenced by notice of appeal.
Court Disposition
Respondent's application to dismiss the appeal for failure to obtain leave dismissed; appeal may proceed to hearing; appellant awarded costs for applications
Orders
- Dismiss Morguard's application to have the appeal dismissed for lack of leave to appeal
- Direct that the appeal proceed to hearing as presently constituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment