Harrison v. Curve Lake First Nation and Canada Post Corporation
The Tribunal will not reopen the March 9, 2018 decision because service on Canada Post was properly effected by courier and established by affidavit in accordance with the Tribunal's Rules, so no denial of procedural fairness occurred and discretion to reopen is not warranted.
- Citation
- 2019 CHRT 36
- Parties
- Complainant: Rosanne Harrison; Commission: Canadian Human Rights Commission; Respondent: Curve Lake First Nation; Respondent: Canada Post Corporation
- Court
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Complaint / Interim Ruling on Motion to Reopen
- Outcome
- Motion to reopen denied; the Tribunal's March 9, 2018 decision adding Canada Post as a respondent remains in effect
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Functus Officio, Natural Justice, Joinder of Parties
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosanne Harrison
Complainant
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Commission
Curve Lake First Nation
Respondent
Canada Post Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Interim Ruling on Motion to Reopen
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should reopen its March 9, 2018 decision
- 2 Whether the Tribunal is functus officio
- 3 Whether service was properly effected on Canada Post
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal will not reopen the March 9, 2018 decision because service on Canada Post was properly effected by courier and established by affidavit in accordance with the Tribunal's Rules, so no denial of procedural fairness occurred and discretion to reopen is not warranted.
Court Disposition
Motion to reopen denied; the Tribunal's March 9, 2018 decision adding Canada Post as a respondent remains in effect
Orders
- The Motion to re-open the Tribunal’s decision of March 9, 2018 is denied
- No re-hearing is ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment