D. G. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The Tribunal held the Commission's request to summarily dismiss the appeal must be refused because the summary dismissal process under the Regulations is initiated by the Tribunal and the Appellant's filed factum met the minimum requirements set out in the Tribunal's order; the material did not demonstrate that the appeal was plainly hopeless or had no reasonable chance of success. The Tribunal therefore denied dismissal on the merits and granted the Commission a 45 day extension to file its factum.
- Citation
- 2017 SSTGDEI 22
- Parties
- Appellant: D. G.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance — Charter Challenge / Preliminary Dismissal Motion (interlocutory Decision)
- Outcome
- Primary request for dismissal refused; Respondent granted extension of time to file factum
- Legal Topics
- Charter S.15 Equality, Summary Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Extension of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. G.
Appellant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance — Charter Challenge / Preliminary Dismissal Motion (interlocutory Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a party may request summary dismissal or only the Tribunal may initiate summary dismissal under the Social Security Tribunal Regulations
- 2 Whether the appeal has no reasonable chance of success under s.53 of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act
- 3 Whether the Appellant complied with the Tribunal's order to file necessary materials to support a constitutional challenge to subsection 21(3) of the Employment Insurance Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held the Commission's request to summarily dismiss the appeal must be refused because the summary dismissal process under the Regulations is initiated by the Tribunal and the Appellant's filed factum met the minimum requirements set out in the Tribunal's order; the material did not demonstrate that the appeal was plainly hopeless or had no reasonable chance of success. The Tribunal therefore denied dismissal on the merits and granted the Commission a 45 day extension to file its factum.
Court Disposition
Primary request for dismissal refused; Respondent granted extension of time to file factum
Orders
- Primary request for dismissal refused
- Respondent granted 45 additional days from notification to file its factum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment