D.N.K. v. D.A.K.

D.N.K. v. D.A.K.

Applicant failed to establish a material change in circumstances and the evidence supported that he was structuring corporate affairs to avoid support obligations; accordingly the court refused to vary or cancel child support, spousal support or arrears and dismissed the application with costs.

Citation
2016 BCSC 2198
Parties
Claimant: D.N.K.; Respondent: D.A.K.; Respondent: B.G.E.S.
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Divorce Act Variation Application (support) / Chambers Decision on Application
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Variation of Support, Material Change of Circumstances, Income Attribution, Sham Corporation, Costs
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D.N.K.

Claimant

D.A.K.

Respondent

B.G.E.S.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Act Variation Application (support) / Chambers Decision on Application

  1. 1 Whether there was a material change in circumstances since the consent/Final Order
  2. 2 Whether income can be attributed to the applicant through corporate structures (White Knight, B.G.E.S.)
  3. 3 Whether child support, spousal support and arrears should be varied or cancelled

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to establish a material change in circumstances and the evidence supported that he was structuring corporate affairs to avoid support obligations; accordingly the court refused to vary or cancel child support, spousal support or arrears and dismissed the application with costs.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded to D.N.K. on the ordinary scale payable by D.A.K.