Biofert Manufacturing Inc. v. Agrisol Manufacturing Inc.
Rule 420 double-tariff costs were not awarded because the August 2, 2019 escalating offer, when properly valued at trial, did not meet the Rule 420 requirement of being as favorable as the judgment at the trial date; solicitor-and-client costs were denied because defendants' conduct did not reach the threshold of reprehensible or outrageous behavior; exercising discretion under Rule 400 and balancing positive and negative factors, the court awarded lump sum costs of $80,000.00 inclusive to be paid jointly and severally by the corporate Defendants and Dr. Tahir Mahmood, and apportioned no costs for or against the remaining defendants.
- Citation
- 2020 FC 501
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Biofert Manufacturing Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Agrisol Manufacturing Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: BioFert NA Manufacturing Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Tahir Mahmood; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Amaran Tyab; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Saif Mahmood; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Farrah Mahmood
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Litigation (trademark and Copyright Infringement) / Post Judgment Costs Determination and Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiff awarded lump sum costs of $80,000.00 inclusive of fees, disbursements and taxes to be paid jointly and severally by Agrisol Manufacturing Inc., BioFert NA Manufacturing Inc. and Dr. Tahir Mahmood; no costs awarded for or against the other defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Costs, Offers to Settle, Rule 420, Rule 400, Solicitor and Client Costs, Double Tariff
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Biofert Manufacturing Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Agrisol Manufacturing Inc.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
BioFert NA Manufacturing Inc.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Tahir Mahmood
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Amaran Tyab
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Saif Mahmood
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Farrah Mahmood
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Litigation (trademark and Copyright Infringement) / Post Judgment Costs Determination and Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's August 2, 2019 escalating settlement offer qualified for double-tariff costs under Federal Courts Rules Rule 420
- 2 Whether solicitor-and-client costs were warranted against the defendants given their conduct and the trial circumstances
- 3 Appropriate valuation date for an escalating offer to settle
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 420 double-tariff costs were not awarded because the August 2, 2019 escalating offer, when properly valued at trial, did not meet the Rule 420 requirement of being as favorable as the judgment at the trial date; solicitor-and-client costs were denied because defendants' conduct did not reach the threshold of reprehensible or outrageous behavior; exercising discretion under Rule 400 and balancing positive and negative factors, the court awarded lump sum costs of $80,000.00 inclusive to be paid jointly and severally by the corporate Defendants and Dr. Tahir Mahmood, and apportioned no costs for or against the remaining defendants.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff awarded lump sum costs of $80,000.00 inclusive of fees, disbursements and taxes to be paid jointly and severally by Agrisol Manufacturing Inc., BioFert NA Manufacturing Inc. and Dr. Tahir Mahmood; no costs awarded for or against the other defendants.
Orders
- Plaintiff to receive a lump sum of $80,000.00 inclusive of fees, disbursements and taxes from Agrisol Manufacturing Inc., BioFert NA Manufacturing Inc. and Dr. Tahir Mahmood on a joint and several basis
- No costs are awarded for or against Amaran Tyab, Saif Mahmood and Farrah Mahmood
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment