Bedada v. Canada (Solicitor General)

Bedada v. Canada (Solicitor General)

The application was dismissed on the basis of mootness because the applicant had been deported and thus there was no longer a live controversy; the Court exercised its discretion not to decide the constitutional challenge and declined to read‑in legislative language absent a meaningful impact on the litigant.

Citation
2007 FC 121
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Bedada; Respondent: Solicitor General
Court
Federal Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
5 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment (dismissed for Mootness)
Outcome
application dismissed for mootness
Legal Topics
Day Parole Eligibility, Removal (deportation) Order, Charter Ss.7, 9, 15, Mootness Doctrine, Reading‑in Remedy
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Bedada

Applicant

Solicitor General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment (dismissed for Mootness)

  1. 1 Whether s.128(4) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act violates ss.7, 9 or 15 of the Charter
  2. 2 Whether any Charter breach could be justified under s.1
  3. 3 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to decide the constitutional issues despite mootness

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed on the basis of mootness because the applicant had been deported and thus there was no longer a live controversy; the Court exercised its discretion not to decide the constitutional challenge and declined to read‑in legislative language absent a meaningful impact on the litigant.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for mootness

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed without costs on the basis of mootness