Bedada v. Canada (Solicitor General)
The application was dismissed on the basis of mootness because the applicant had been deported and thus there was no longer a live controversy; the Court exercised its discretion not to decide the constitutional challenge and declined to read‑in legislative language absent a meaningful impact on the litigant.
- Citation
- 2007 FC 121
- Parties
- Applicant: Daniel Bedada; Respondent: Solicitor General
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment (dismissed for Mootness)
- Outcome
- application dismissed for mootness
- Legal Topics
- Day Parole Eligibility, Removal (deportation) Order, Charter Ss.7, 9, 15, Mootness Doctrine, Reading‑in Remedy
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Bedada
Applicant
Solicitor General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment (dismissed for Mootness)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.128(4) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act violates ss.7, 9 or 15 of the Charter
- 2 Whether any Charter breach could be justified under s.1
- 3 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to decide the constitutional issues despite mootness
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed on the basis of mootness because the applicant had been deported and thus there was no longer a live controversy; the Court exercised its discretion not to decide the constitutional challenge and declined to read‑in legislative language absent a meaningful impact on the litigant.
Court Disposition
application dismissed for mootness
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed without costs on the basis of mootness
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment