Germain v. Montreal (City)
The surtax on non-residential buildings is a direct tax raised for provincial purposes under s.92(2) and constitutes a true land tax within provincial jurisdiction; accordingly the challenged statutory and municipal provisions are valid and the appeals must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [1997] 1 SCR 1144
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Germain; Appellant: Nicolas Bougoulias; Appellant: Frank Scarpelli; Appellant: Louise Coiteux Di Renzo; Appellant: Julieta Sousa; Respondent/mis En Cause: The Attorney General of Quebec; Respondent/mis En Cause: The City of Montreal; Intervener: The Attorney General for Ontario
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Quebec Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Division of Powers, Surtax on Non Residential Buildings, Direct Tax, Land Taxes, Constitution Act, 1867 S.92(2)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Germain
Appellant
Nicolas Bougoulias
Appellant
Frank Scarpelli
Appellant
Louise Coiteux Di Renzo
Appellant
Julieta Sousa
Appellant
The Attorney General of Quebec
Respondent/mis En Cause
The City of Montreal
Respondent/mis En Cause
The Attorney General for Ontario
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Quebec Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the municipal surtax on non-residential buildings is a direct tax within provincial jurisdiction under s.92(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867
- 2 Whether the surtax qualifies as a true land tax or is ultra vires provincial power
- 3 Constitutional validity of provisions of the Act respecting Municipal Taxation and the municipal by-law imposing the surtax
Ratio Decidendi
The surtax on non-residential buildings is a direct tax raised for provincial purposes under s.92(2) and constitutes a true land tax within provincial jurisdiction; accordingly the challenged statutory and municipal provisions are valid and the appeals must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment