Mynio v. Mynio
The court found the claimant established a material change in circumstances based on newly available expert evidence revealing the respondent's substantially higher guideline income and the prolonged, repeated adjournments of trial; accordingly the interim spousal support order was varied to increase support to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2024 BCSC 544
- Parties
- Claimant: Jody-Lynne Mynio; Respondent: Daniel Michael Mynio
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law (divorce Act Corollary Relief and Property Division) / Interim Application to Vary Prior Interim Orders; Pre Trial (trial Scheduled Sept 23, 2024)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part and dismissed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Interim Orders, Spousal Support (interim and Retroactive), Sale of Former Family Residence, Material Change in Circumstances, Income Imputation and Guideline Income
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jody-Lynne Mynio
Claimant
Daniel Michael Mynio
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law (divorce Act Corollary Relief and Property Division) / Interim Application to Vary Prior Interim Orders; Pre Trial (trial Scheduled Sept 23, 2024)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim spousal support order should be varied
- 2 Whether a lump sum retroactive spousal support award should be made now
- 3 Whether the court should order sale of the former family residence on an interlocutory basis
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the claimant established a material change in circumstances based on newly available expert evidence revealing the respondent's substantially higher guideline income and the prolonged, repeated adjournments of trial; accordingly the interim spousal support order was varied to increase support to the mid-point guideline amount ($4,345/month effective January 2024), while lump sum retroactive support prior to September 2023 and interlocutory sale of the Property were deferred/dismissed because retroactive quantum is better determined at trial and sale was neither necessary nor shown to be expedient/advantageous to both parties.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part and dismissed in part.
Orders
- Respondent to pay claimant interim spousal support of $4,345 per month starting January 2024, payable no later than the 15th of each month; amounts for January, February and March 2024 payable forthwith less payments already made.
- Application for lump sum retroactive spousal support dismissed (deferred to trial).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment