Re: 1527920 BC Ltd.

Re: 1527920 BC Ltd.

Relief under s.11 CCAA was refused because Felix had completed restructuring and exited CCAA supervision, the discretionary power under s.11 must further CCAA remedial objectives, the applicant failed to demonstrate appropriateness and adequate due diligence, and the dispute raised complex issues unsuitable for the proposed expedited summary process.

Citation
2025 BCSC 2613
Parties
Petitioner: 1527920 BC Ltd.; Respondent: Dapit NA, LLC; Third Party: Third Party
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
20 November 2025
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (ccaa) / Chambers Oral Reasons on Application Under S.11 Following Completed Restructuring
Outcome
Relief sought denied; application dismissed
Legal Topics
Assignment Validity, Jurisdiction Under S.11 CCAA, Summary/expedited Procedure, Restructuring (rvo), Single Proceeding Model, Due Diligence in Insolvency
Source Language
English
Insolvency Corporate Law Intellectual Property Civil Procedure Assignment Validity Jurisdiction Under S.11 CCAA Summary/expedited Procedure Restructuring (rvo) +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

1527920 BC Ltd.

Petitioner

Dapit NA, LLC

Respondent

Third Party

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Application Under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (ccaa) / Chambers Oral Reasons on Application Under S.11 Following Completed Restructuring

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction under s.11 CCAA to determine the validity of the US-registered assignment of IP post-restructuring
  2. 2 Whether an expedited summary notice-of-application process is appropriate for resolving the IP assignment dispute
  3. 3 Whether the relief sought furthers the remedial objectives of the CCAA given Felix has emerged from the proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

Relief under s.11 CCAA was refused because Felix had completed restructuring and exited CCAA supervision, the discretionary power under s.11 must further CCAA remedial objectives, the applicant failed to demonstrate appropriateness and adequate due diligence, and the dispute raised complex issues unsuitable for the proposed expedited summary process.

Court Disposition

Relief sought denied; application dismissed

Orders

  • Relief sought under s.11 CCAA refused
  • No costs awarded