Mrkonjic v. Darrell Jessome Inc.
The subpoena of ICANS communications was quashed as privileged; the claimant was not qualified as an expert and did not prove negligence or that the $600 plus HST charge was unreasonable; therefore the claim for a refund is dismissed.
- Citation
- 2008 NSSM 5
- Parties
- Claimant: JOSEPH MRKONJIC; Defendant: DARRELL JESSOME INCORPORATED
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court – Civil Claim for Refund of Professional Fees / Hearing and Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reasonableness of Professional Fees, Privilege of Regulatory Proceedings, Admissibility and Qualification of Expert Evidence, Subpoena Quashing/non Suit Motion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JOSEPH MRKONJIC
Claimant
DARRELL JESSOME INCORPORATED
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court – Civil Claim for Refund of Professional Fees / Hearing and Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant overcharged for accounting services
- 2 Whether communications and meetings with the professional regulator (ICANS) were admissible and the subpoena enforceable
- 3 Whether the claimant could give expert evidence on public accounting and thus prove the fee was unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoena of ICANS communications was quashed as privileged; the claimant was not qualified as an expert and did not prove negligence or that the $600 plus HST charge was unreasonable; therefore the claim for a refund is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Subpoena to the Director of Regulatory Affairs of ICANS quashed
- Claim dismissed; $600 plus HST charge upheld (no further refund ordered)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment