Mrkonjic v. Darrell Jessome Inc.

Mrkonjic v. Darrell Jessome Inc.

The subpoena of ICANS communications was quashed as privileged; the claimant was not qualified as an expert and did not prove negligence or that the $600 plus HST charge was unreasonable; therefore the claim for a refund is dismissed.

Citation
2008 NSSM 5
Parties
Claimant: JOSEPH MRKONJIC; Defendant: DARRELL JESSOME INCORPORATED
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 January 2008
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court – Civil Claim for Refund of Professional Fees / Hearing and Final Decision
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Reasonableness of Professional Fees, Privilege of Regulatory Proceedings, Admissibility and Qualification of Expert Evidence, Subpoena Quashing/non Suit Motion
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JOSEPH MRKONJIC

Claimant

DARRELL JESSOME INCORPORATED

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court – Civil Claim for Refund of Professional Fees / Hearing and Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the defendant overcharged for accounting services
  2. 2 Whether communications and meetings with the professional regulator (ICANS) were admissible and the subpoena enforceable
  3. 3 Whether the claimant could give expert evidence on public accounting and thus prove the fee was unreasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The subpoena of ICANS communications was quashed as privileged; the claimant was not qualified as an expert and did not prove negligence or that the $600 plus HST charge was unreasonable; therefore the claim for a refund is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Subpoena to the Director of Regulatory Affairs of ICANS quashed
  • Claim dismissed; $600 plus HST charge upheld (no further refund ordered)