R. v. Forrest
The judge accepted the credible and corroborated evidence of Crown witnesses (Crystal Hatcher and Jolene Gillard), the 911 call and documentary exhibits, rejected defence witnesses where inconsistent, and concluded the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that David Angus Forrest was a party to the home invasion (break and enter and theft), committed an assault on Greg Forrest, and breached his undertaking by failing to keep the peace.
- Citation
- 2018 NSPC 51
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: David Angus Forrest
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Indictment / Trial Judge Decision After Judge Alone Trial
- Outcome
- Guilty on all counts
- Legal Topics
- Break and Enter, Theft, Assault, Breach of Undertaking, Party Liability (s.21 Criminal Code), Credibility of Witnesses, Home Invasion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
David Angus Forrest
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Indictment / Trial Judge Decision After Judge Alone Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused participated as a party to the home invasion (break and enter and theft)
- 2 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted Greg Forrest (s.266(b) Criminal Code)
- 3 Whether the accused breached his undertaking by failing to keep the peace and be of good behaviour (s.145(5.1) Criminal Code)
Ratio Decidendi
The judge accepted the credible and corroborated evidence of Crown witnesses (Crystal Hatcher and Jolene Gillard), the 911 call and documentary exhibits, rejected defence witnesses where inconsistent, and concluded the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that David Angus Forrest was a party to the home invasion (break and enter and theft), committed an assault on Greg Forrest, and breached his undertaking by failing to keep the peace.
Court Disposition
Guilty on all counts
Orders
- Convicted of break and enter and indictable theft contrary to Criminal Code s.348(1)(b)
- Convicted as a party of assault contrary to Criminal Code s.266(b)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment