Tracey v. Gokturk
Petition dismissed except for a mandamus order: petitioners failed to establish breaches of directors' duties or other grounds under ss.144 or 247 CBCA to adjourn or alter the shareholder requisitioned meeting called by Gokturk; however, equity and inherent jurisdiction require Payfirma to provide petitioners with shareholder email addresses and telephone numbers in its possession, excluding contacts obtained by Gokturk after August 25, 2017.
- Citation
- 2017 BCSC 1813
- Parties
- Petitioner Director: Lance Tracey; Petitioner Director: Marc Levy; Petitioner Director: Roger Hardy; Respondent Director and Shareholder, CEO: Michael Gokturk; Respondent Director and Chair: John Rante; Respondent Director: Ryan Holmes; Respondent Corporation: Payfirma Corporation
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Petition Under the Canada Business Corporations Act (corporate Governance) / Oral Reasons for Judgment (in Chambers) Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed except for an order of mandamus requiring Payfirma to deliver shareholder contact information (limited exclusion); respondents awarded ordinary costs
- Legal Topics
- Deadlock, Proxy Solicitation, Shareholder Meeting Requisition, Directors' Duties (s.122 Cbca), S.144 CBCA, S.247 CBCA, Mandamus, Disclosure of Shareholder Contact Information
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lance Tracey
Petitioner Director
Marc Levy
Petitioner Director
Roger Hardy
Petitioner Director
Michael Gokturk
Respondent Director and Shareholder, CEO
John Rante
Respondent Director and Chair
Ryan Holmes
Respondent Director
Payfirma Corporation
Respondent Corporation
Procedural Posture
Petition Under the Canada Business Corporations Act (corporate Governance) / Oral Reasons for Judgment (in Chambers) Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order adjournment or alteration of a shareholder requisitioned meeting called under s.143(4) CBCA
- 2 Whether respondent directors breached duties under s.122 CBCA sufficient to justify relief under s.144 or s.247 CBCA
- 3 Whether the court should order production of shareholder contact information and appoint an independent chair
Ratio Decidendi
Petition dismissed except for a mandamus order: petitioners failed to establish breaches of directors' duties or other grounds under ss.144 or 247 CBCA to adjourn or alter the shareholder requisitioned meeting called by Gokturk; however, equity and inherent jurisdiction require Payfirma to provide petitioners with shareholder email addresses and telephone numbers in its possession, excluding contacts obtained by Gokturk after August 25, 2017.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed except for an order of mandamus requiring Payfirma to deliver shareholder contact information (limited exclusion); respondents awarded ordinary costs
Orders
- Petition dismissed except as to order for mandamus
- Payfirma Corporation to deliver forthwith to petitioners' solicitors a list of all shareholder email addresses and telephone numbers in its possession, excluding email addresses and telephone numbers first obtained by Michael Gokturk after August 25, 2017
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment