Alimport (Empresa Cubana Importadora de Alimentos) v. Victoria Transport Ltd.
The declinatory exception raised was ratione personae and thus subject to the mandatory time limit in art.161 C.C.P.; the respondent failed to raise it within that limit and took procedural steps (motion for particulars) that implied submission to jurisdiction; the contractual forum clause amounted to an election of domicile in Montreal; accordingly the Superior Court correctly dismissed the tardy exception and the Court of Appeal’s reversal was set aside.
- Citation
- [1977] 2 SCR 858
- Parties
- Appellant (plaintiff): Alimport (Empresa Cubana Importadora de Alimentos); Respondent (defendant): Victoria Transport Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (contract Dispute) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal of Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment of the Court of Appeal set aside; judgment of the Superior Court restored.
- Legal Topics
- Declinatory Exception, Jurisdiction Ratione Personae, Election of Domicile, Mandatory Procedural Delays, Service Outside Jurisdiction, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alimport (Empresa Cubana Importadora de Alimentos)
Appellant (plaintiff)
Victoria Transport Ltd.
Respondent (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (contract Dispute) / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal of Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the declinatory exception raising lack of jurisdiction ratione personae was filed within the mandatory delay under art.161 C.C.P.
- 2 Whether lack of jurisdiction ratione materiae can be raised at any time and thus excuse a late declinatory exception
- 3 Whether the contractual forum clause constituted an effective election of domicile in Montreal
Ratio Decidendi
The declinatory exception raised was ratione personae and thus subject to the mandatory time limit in art.161 C.C.P.; the respondent failed to raise it within that limit and took procedural steps (motion for particulars) that implied submission to jurisdiction; the contractual forum clause amounted to an election of domicile in Montreal; accordingly the Superior Court correctly dismissed the tardy exception and the Court of Appeal’s reversal was set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment of the Court of Appeal set aside; judgment of the Superior Court restored.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment