R. v. Gordon

R. v. Gordon

Fresh, credible and material evidence of the appellant's exceptional institutional conduct and viable post-release living arrangements warranted intervention by the appellate court to reduce the sentence to time served while leaving the probation order intact.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2010 ONCA 880
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Denise Gordon
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
20 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence (court of Appeal Decision)
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to time served; probation order remains in place
Legal Topics
Sentence Reduction, Fresh Evidence, Probation Order, Time Served
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Appeal Sentence Reduction Fresh Evidence Probation Order Time Served

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Denise Gordon

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence (court of Appeal Decision)

  1. 1 Whether the sentence should be varied on appeal
  2. 2 Whether fresh evidence justified a reduction of the sentence
  3. 3 Whether the probation order should remain in force

Ratio Decidendi

Fresh, credible and material evidence of the appellant's exceptional institutional conduct and viable post-release living arrangements warranted intervention by the appellate court to reduce the sentence to time served while leaving the probation order intact.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to time served; probation order remains in place

Orders

  • Allow the appeal and reduce the sentence to time served
  • Probation order to remain in place