Nova Scotia (Assessment) v. Artificial Reef Society of Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia (Assessment) v. Artificial Reef Society of Nova Scotia

The Court refused to disturb the trial judge's discretionary costs award because no wrong principle of law was applied and there was no manifest injustice; it declined to admit the proposed fresh evidence as irrelevant; accordingly leave to appeal and cross-appeal was granted but substantive appeals were denied, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 NSCA 67
Parties
Appellant: Director of Assessment; Appellant: Town of Bridgewater; Respondent: The Artificial Reef Society of Nova Scotia
Court
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Cross Appeal in the Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Fresh Evidence, Costs Discretion, Cross Appeal, Standard of Review
Source Language
en
Tax/assessment Administrative Law Civil Procedure Costs Leave to Appeal Fresh Evidence Costs Discretion Cross Appeal +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Assessment

Appellant

Town of Bridgewater

Appellant

The Artificial Reef Society of Nova Scotia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Cross Appeal in the Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether to disturb a trial judge's discretionary award of costs
  2. 2 Whether to admit proposed fresh evidence (correspondence) on appeal
  3. 3 Whether to grant substantive relief on appeal and cross-appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Court refused to disturb the trial judge's discretionary costs award because no wrong principle of law was applied and there was no manifest injustice; it declined to admit the proposed fresh evidence as irrelevant; accordingly leave to appeal and cross-appeal was granted but substantive appeals were denied, and the respondent was awarded specified costs for attendance.

Court Disposition

Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal and cross-appeal granted but each appeal denied
  • Decline to receive the proposed fresh evidence (impugned correspondence)