R. v. J.J.W.
Court ordered disclosure of Cst. Dalphy's notes relating to operation of the Lockview Road check-point for the three weeks prior to the arrest because Defence satisfied the low Stinchcombe threshold that the material may be of some use to the accused and the Crown failed to demonstrate the notes are clearly irrelevant; Defence was not required to call evidence or meet an 'air of reality' test and oral submissions sufficed.
- Citation
- 2008 NSPC 10
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused (young Person): J.J.W.
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Youth / Pre Trial Disclosure Application
- Outcome
- Disclosure granted
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Obligations (stinchcombe), Police Check Point Searches, Section 8 Search and Seizure, Section 10(b) Right to Counsel, Publication Restrictions for Youth
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
J.J.W.
Accused (young Person)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Youth / Pre Trial Disclosure Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Crown must disclose police notes of Cst. Dalphy for three weeks prior to arrest
- 2 Standard and burden for establishing relevance in disclosure requests
- 3 Whether defence must adduce evidence or meet an 'air of reality' to obtain disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
Court ordered disclosure of Cst. Dalphy's notes relating to operation of the Lockview Road check-point for the three weeks prior to the arrest because Defence satisfied the low Stinchcombe threshold that the material may be of some use to the accused and the Crown failed to demonstrate the notes are clearly irrelevant; Defence was not required to call evidence or meet an 'air of reality' test and oral submissions sufficed.
Court Disposition
Disclosure granted
Orders
- Crown must disclose Cst. Earl Dalphy's notes relating to the operation of the Lockview Road roadside check-point for the three weeks prior to September 25, 2007, subject to any valid redactions for privilege or youth publication restrictions; any dispute over redactions to be addressed by further submissions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment