Walter Energy Canada Holdings, Inc. (Re)
The court dismissed the 1974 Plan's application for broad document production because the requests were not sufficiently targeted and the Plan failed to show Walter Energy had sole possession or control of documents originating with U.S. entities; the court also dismissed the application to strike the expert report, allowed Walter Energy to proceed with its proposed summary hearing on threshold issues, and awarded party-and-party costs against the 1974 Plan to Walter Energy and the Union.
- Citation
- 2016 BCSC 2470
- Parties
- Petitioner: Walter Energy Canada Holdings, Inc.; Applicant / Claimant: United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan and Trust; Opposing Creditor / Intervenor: United Steel Workers, Local 1-424; Monitor: KPMG
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (ccaa) Proceedings / Pre Summary Hearing Applications Concerning Document Disclosure and Motion to Strike Expert Report; Interlocutory Directions Issued Pending Summary Determination Scheduled January 2017
- Outcome
- 1974 Plan's document disclosure application dismissed; application to strike Marc Abrams' expert report dismissed; Walter Energy permitted to proceed with its summary hearing application; costs awarded to Walter Energy and the Union against the 1974 Plan.
- Legal Topics
- Document Disclosure, Expert Evidence, Choice of Law, Extraterritorial Application of ERISA, CCAA Claims Adjudication, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walter Energy Canada Holdings, Inc.
Petitioner
United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan and Trust
Applicant / Claimant
United Steel Workers, Local 1-424
Opposing Creditor / Intervenor
KPMG
Monitor
Procedural Posture
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (ccaa) Proceedings / Pre Summary Hearing Applications Concerning Document Disclosure and Motion to Strike Expert Report; Interlocutory Directions Issued Pending Summary Determination Scheduled January 2017
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Walter Energy must disclose extensive documents allegedly in its possession or control including materials originating from U.S. group entities
- 2 Whether Marc Abrams' expert report should be struck
- 3 Whether a summary hearing is appropriate to determine threshold legal issues including choice of law and extraterritoriality of ERISA
Ratio Decidendi
The court dismissed the 1974 Plan's application for broad document production because the requests were not sufficiently targeted and the Plan failed to show Walter Energy had sole possession or control of documents originating with U.S. entities; the court also dismissed the application to strike the expert report, allowed Walter Energy to proceed with its proposed summary hearing on threshold issues, and awarded party-and-party costs against the 1974 Plan to Walter Energy and the Union.
Court Disposition
1974 Plan's document disclosure application dismissed; application to strike Marc Abrams' expert report dismissed; Walter Energy permitted to proceed with its summary hearing application; costs awarded to Walter Energy and the Union against the 1974 Plan.
Orders
- Dismissal of the 1974 Plan's application for document disclosure (paragraph 2 of its notice of application)
- Dismissal of the 1974 Plan's application to strike the expert report of Marc Abrams (written reasons to follow)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment