Bizvoie v. Cornish et al.
Applying the established factors (plaintiff's impecuniosity, counsel bearing disbursements and risk, the complexity of liability and damages, hours and skill of counsel, settlement size and consistency with comparable decisions), the court found the reduced contingency fee of $750,000 (approx. 21% of the $3,566,000 settlement) reasonable and approved it plus GST and PST.
- Citation
- 2003 BCSC 1615
- Parties
- Plaintiff (infant): John Wallaze Bizovie, an Infant, by his Guardian Ad Litem Jeff Bizovie; Defendant: Dr. Bruce M. Cornish; Defendant: Royal Columbia Hospital; Third Party: Royal Columbia Hospital; Third Party: Shirda Yung; Third Party: Willis Gooding; Third Party: Mildred Masunda; Third Party: Jennifer Fowler
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Negligence / Personal Injury Birth Injury / Application for Approval of Solicitors' Contingency Fee Post Settlement
- Outcome
- Application to approve solicitor's contingency fee granted.
- Legal Topics
- Contingency Fee Approval, Solicitor's Fees, Settlement, Damages Assessment, Infant Plaintiff, Guardian Ad Litem
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Wallaze Bizovie, an Infant, by his Guardian Ad Litem Jeff Bizovie
Plaintiff (infant)
Dr. Bruce M. Cornish
Defendant
Royal Columbia Hospital
Defendant
Royal Columbia Hospital
Third Party
Shirda Yung
Third Party
Willis Gooding
Third Party
Mildred Masunda
Third Party
Jennifer Fowler
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence / Personal Injury Birth Injury / Application for Approval of Solicitors' Contingency Fee Post Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contingency fee agreed with counsel is reasonable and should be approved by the court
- 2 Whether the fee should be reduced from the contractual amount given the circumstances
- 3 What weight to give factors such as plaintiff's financial circumstances, risk assumed by counsel, time expended, complexity, disbursements borne and comparators
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the established factors (plaintiff's impecuniosity, counsel bearing disbursements and risk, the complexity of liability and damages, hours and skill of counsel, settlement size and consistency with comparable decisions), the court found the reduced contingency fee of $750,000 (approx. 21% of the $3,566,000 settlement) reasonable and approved it plus GST and PST.
Court Disposition
Application to approve solicitor's contingency fee granted.
Orders
- Approve solicitor's fee of $750,000 plus G.S.T. and P.S.T.
- Costs to be adjourned; parties encouraged to settle costs and have liberty to apply if unable to do so.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment