Southwood v. El-Hawary
The prior adjudication by Adjudicator Cooke produced an issue estoppel that precluded relitigation of the first five seminars; evidence and the absence of explanation for why Exhibit D-8 was not before Cooke led to the conclusion that Exhibit D-8 was not the material given to Montreal students and that Dr. El-Hawary knew infringing material would be provided to Toronto students, resulting in findings of copyright infringement in respect of Iberville and Toronto; damages were assessed at $100 per infringement given overlap with prior findings and EPIC's settlement; EPIC's settlement did not bar Southwood from pursuing El-Hawary and accordingly cross-claims were dismissed; no costs were...
- Citation
- 2004 NSSM 41
- Parties
- Claimant: Charles Michael Southwood; Defendant: Dr. M. E. El-Hawary; Third Party: EPIC Educational Program Innovations Centre
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court / Adjudication/decision
- Outcome
- Consolidation granted; partial judgment for claimant on additional infringements (Iberville and Toronto); award of $200 total; cross-claims dismissed; no costs awarded
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Damages, Limitation Period, Settlement Agreement, Third Party Claim, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Michael Southwood
Claimant
Dr. M. E. El-Hawary
Defendant
EPIC Educational Program Innovations Centre
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Adjudication/decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prior adjudication (Adjudicator Cooke) barred relitigation of earlier seminars (res judicata/issue estoppel)
- 2 Whether Dr. El-Hawary infringed Mr. Southwood's copyright in respect of the Iberville and Toronto seminars
- 3 What damages are appropriate for the Iberville and Toronto infringements
Ratio Decidendi
The prior adjudication by Adjudicator Cooke produced an issue estoppel that precluded relitigation of the first five seminars; evidence and the absence of explanation for why Exhibit D-8 was not before Cooke led to the conclusion that Exhibit D-8 was not the material given to Montreal students and that Dr. El-Hawary knew infringing material would be provided to Toronto students, resulting in findings of copyright infringement in respect of Iberville and Toronto; damages were assessed at $100 per infringement given overlap with prior findings and EPIC's settlement; EPIC's settlement did not bar Southwood from pursuing El-Hawary and accordingly cross-claims were dismissed; no costs were...
Court Disposition
Consolidation granted; partial judgment for claimant on additional infringements (Iberville and Toronto); award of $200 total; cross-claims dismissed; no costs awarded
Orders
- Consolidation of Small Claims Court actions 214175, 216708 and 219177
- Find that Mr. Southwood's claim with respect to seminars one through five was already determined in SCCH No. 113804
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment