Ayangma v. Canada
The Court found no error in the decision of MacKay J. and therefore dismissed the appeal and awarded costs to the respondent.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2003 FCA 46
- Parties
- Appellant: DR. NOËL AYANGMA; Respondent: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal (dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Review, Error of Law, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DR. NOËL AYANGMA
Appellant
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal (dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court judge (MacKay J.) erred in law or fact warranting appellate intervention
- 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to have the judgment below set aside
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found no error in the decision of MacKay J. and therefore dismissed the appeal and awarded costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Ayangma v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-01-27 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 46 File numbers A-74-02 Decision Content Date: 20030127 Docket: A-74-02 Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 46 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: DR. NOËL AYANGMA Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on January, 27th, 2003. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on January 27th, 2003. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A. Date: 20030127 Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 46 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. Docket: A-74-02 BETWEEN: DR. NOËL AYANGMA Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Halifax, Nova Scotia on January 27th, 2003). [1] We have not been persuaded that MacKay J. erred in a way which would warrant an intervention. [2] This appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs. Alice Desjardins J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-74-02 STYLE OF CAUSE: DR. NOËL AYANGMA v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: HALIFAX DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 27, 2003 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: DESJARDINS J.A. DATED: JANUARY 27, 2003 APPEARANCES: DR. NOËL AYANGMA FOR THE APPELLANT MR. JAMES GUNVALDSEN-KLAASSEN FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: MORRIS ROSENBERG FOR THE RESPONDENT DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA