R v. DS
Although the complainant was found to be forthright and credible on many points, the accuseds testimony created a reasonable doubt about whether the touching amounted to sexual assault; the Crown did not meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused must be acquitted.
- Citation
- 2024 NSSC 178
- Parties
- Crown/prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: DS; Complainant: EM
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Verdict/decision
- Outcome
- Accused acquitted of charge of sexual assault contrary to s.271 of the Criminal Code
- Legal Topics
- Section 271 Criminal Code, Section 486.4 Publication Ban, Credibility Assessment, Reasonable Doubt, Browne V Dunn
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown/prosecution
DS
Defendant
EM
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Verdict/decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown proved sexual assault contrary to s.271 beyond a reasonable doubt
- 2 Assessment of credibility of complainant and accused where versions overlap
- 3 Application of legal principles when accused testifies (R v WD)
Ratio Decidendi
Although the complainant was found to be forthright and credible on many points, the accuseds testimony created a reasonable doubt about whether the touching amounted to sexual assault; the Crown did not meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused must be acquitted.
Court Disposition
Accused acquitted of charge of sexual assault contrary to s.271 of the Criminal Code
Orders
- Accused acquitted of sexual assault (s.271 Criminal Code)
- Publication ban ordered under s.486.4 of the Criminal Code (restriction on publication identifying complainant)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment