R v. DS

R v. DS

Although the complainant was found to be forthright and credible on many points, the accuseds testimony created a reasonable doubt about whether the touching amounted to sexual assault; the Crown did not meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused must be acquitted.

Citation
2024 NSSC 178
Parties
Crown/prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: DS; Complainant: EM
Court
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Verdict/decision
Outcome
Accused acquitted of charge of sexual assault contrary to s.271 of the Criminal Code
Legal Topics
Section 271 Criminal Code, Section 486.4 Publication Ban, Credibility Assessment, Reasonable Doubt, Browne V Dunn
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Crown/prosecution

DS

Defendant

EM

Complainant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sexual Assault / Trial Verdict/decision

  1. 1 Whether the Crown proved sexual assault contrary to s.271 beyond a reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Assessment of credibility of complainant and accused where versions overlap
  3. 3 Application of legal principles when accused testifies (R v WD)

Ratio Decidendi

Although the complainant was found to be forthright and credible on many points, the accuseds testimony created a reasonable doubt about whether the touching amounted to sexual assault; the Crown did not meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt and the accused must be acquitted.

Court Disposition

Accused acquitted of charge of sexual assault contrary to s.271 of the Criminal Code

Orders

  • Accused acquitted of sexual assault (s.271 Criminal Code)
  • Publication ban ordered under s.486.4 of the Criminal Code (restriction on publication identifying complainant)