R. v. Wen

R. v. Wen

The accused's honest belief that his licence was valid was not reasonable because he failed to take any steps to ascertain the status of his licence after previous convictions; the Crown's certificate conclusively proved the suspension and the accused did not discharge the onus to establish due diligence on a balance of probabilities, therefore guilty verdict is warranted.

Citation
2012 NSPC 57
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty The Queen; Accused: Yicheng Wen
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
26 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Motor Vehicle Act Prosecution / Trial Judgment (provincial Court Decision)
Outcome
Guilty (conviction entered for driving while suspended)
Legal Topics
Due Diligence Defence, License Suspension, Notice of Suspension, Demerit Points, Officially Induced Error
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty The Queen

Crown

Yicheng Wen

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Motor Vehicle Act Prosecution / Trial Judgment (provincial Court Decision)

  1. 1 Whether the accused established a due diligence defence to the charge of driving while suspended
  2. 2 Whether the accused's honest belief that his licence was valid was reasonable
  3. 3 Whether non-receipt of the Registrar's notice negates the suspension or the Crown's evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The accused's honest belief that his licence was valid was not reasonable because he failed to take any steps to ascertain the status of his licence after previous convictions; the Crown's certificate conclusively proved the suspension and the accused did not discharge the onus to establish due diligence on a balance of probabilities, therefore guilty verdict is warranted.

Court Disposition

Guilty (conviction entered for driving while suspended)

Orders

  • Convicted of driving contrary to s.287(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act