Tyrrell v. Canada (Attorney General)
The Assistant Commissioner was entitled to rely on the January 16, 2006 version of CD 090 which removed any grandfather exception for TV tuner cards; given the removal and the institutional security justification the seizure and denial did not breach ss.7, 8 or 12 of the Charter and the grievance decision was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2008 FC 42
- Parties
- Applicant: Duff Tyrrell; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada; Respondent: Commissioner of Correctional Service of Canada; Respondent: Mission Institution
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Decision (reasons for Order and Order)
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed; costs awarded to respondents
- Legal Topics
- Charter S.7, Charter S.8, Charter S.12, Statutory Interpretation, Commissioner's Directive CD 090, Grievance Procedure, Seizure of Property
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Duff Tyrrell
Applicant
Attorney General of Canada
Respondent
Commissioner of Correctional Service of Canada
Respondent
Mission Institution
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Decision (reasons for Order and Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether confiscation of inmate's computer with TV tuner card violated Charter rights (ss.7,8,12)
- 2 Whether Correctional Service of Canada committed a reviewable error in denying third level grievance by failing to apply Poulin or by misinterpreting CD 090
- 3 Whether court should order reimbursement of $2,200 for the computer
Ratio Decidendi
The Assistant Commissioner was entitled to rely on the January 16, 2006 version of CD 090 which removed any grandfather exception for TV tuner cards; given the removal and the institutional security justification the seizure and denial did not breach ss.7, 8 or 12 of the Charter and the grievance decision was correctly dismissed; the judicial review application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed; costs awarded to respondents
Orders
- The application for judicial review is dismissed.
- Costs fixed at $300 are awarded to the Respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment