R. v. Vernal

R. v. Vernal

Because potential immigration consequences that were not considered at sentencing were identified and the Crown consented, the appellate court allowed the appeal and reduced the sentence to six months less one day.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2018 ONCA 132
Parties
Appellant: Dwayne Lushaine Rumondo Vernal; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed on consent; sentence reduced.
Legal Topics
Sentencing Reduction, Immigration Consequences, Consent Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Immigration Law Sentencing Reduction Immigration Consequences Consent Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dwayne Lushaine Rumondo Vernal

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence should be reduced because of potential immigration consequences that were not known at the time of sentencing
  2. 2 Whether the appeal can be allowed on consent to vary the imposed sentence

Ratio Decidendi

Because potential immigration consequences that were not considered at sentencing were identified and the Crown consented, the appellate court allowed the appeal and reduced the sentence to six months less one day.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed on consent; sentence reduced.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed on consent.
  • Original sentence reduced to six months less one day.