Osawe (Re)

Osawe (Re)

The Court concluded the Board's refusal to order a conditional discharge was reasonable based on evidence that the proposed terms lacked necessary structure and supervision; however the disposition contained an obvious oversight and must be amended by deleting the phrase '24 hour a day supervised' from paragraph 2(f).

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2018 ONCA 940
Parties
Appellant: Edward Osawe; Respondent: Attorney General of Ontario; Intervener: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code / Appeal From Ontario Review Board Disposition
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part: the Ontario Review Board's disposition is otherwise upheld as reasonable but is amended to remove the phrase '24 hour a day supervised' from paragraph 2(f).
Legal Topics
Conditional Discharge, Detention Order, Supervision Requirements, Risk Management, Consent to Treatment, Reasonableness Review
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Administrative Law Forensic Psychiatry Conditional Discharge Detention Order Supervision Requirements Risk Management +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Osawe

Appellant

Attorney General of Ontario

Respondent

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code / Appeal From Ontario Review Board Disposition

  1. 1 Whether the Ontario Review Board's disposition was unreasonable
  2. 2 Whether a conditional discharge with proposed terms would provide equivalent public protection to continued detention
  3. 3 Whether the 24 hour a day supervision phrase in the disposition was an oversight and should be removed

Ratio Decidendi

The Court concluded the Board's refusal to order a conditional discharge was reasonable based on evidence that the proposed terms lacked necessary structure and supervision; however the disposition contained an obvious oversight and must be amended by deleting the phrase '24 hour a day supervised' from paragraph 2(f).

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part: the Ontario Review Board's disposition is otherwise upheld as reasonable but is amended to remove the phrase '24 hour a day supervised' from paragraph 2(f).

Orders

  • Amend the Ontario Review Board disposition by removing the phrase '24 hour a day supervised' from paragraph 2(f).