Brisbin v. Gilby
Adjudicator found on balance of probabilities the defect (significant hydrostatic basement leakage) predated closing and the seller's disclosure was inaccurate as to absence of recent problems; claimant reasonably relied on that inaccurate disclosure; liability found under negligent misrepresentation/collateral warranty; damages awarded for remediation proven to relate to breach, with disallowance of unproven driveway/walkway items and a one-third betterment deduction, plus costs, resulting in total judgment of $10,040.32.
- Citation
- 2007 NSSM 66
- Parties
- Claimant: Virginia Brisbin; Defendant: Elizabeth Gilby
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Property Condition Disclosure / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; Defendant ordered to pay total $10,040.32 (debt $9,860.32; costs $180.00).
- Legal Topics
- Property Condition Disclosure, Non Disclosure, Disclosure Statements, Damages, Betterment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Virginia Brisbin
Claimant
Elizabeth Gilby
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Property Condition Disclosure / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the seller made an insufficient or inaccurate disclosure on the property condition disclosure statement giving rise to liability
- 2 If liability found, appropriate measure and quantum of damages
Ratio Decidendi
Adjudicator found on balance of probabilities the defect (significant hydrostatic basement leakage) predated closing and the seller's disclosure was inaccurate as to absence of recent problems; claimant reasonably relied on that inaccurate disclosure; liability found under negligent misrepresentation/collateral warranty; damages awarded for remediation proven to relate to breach, with disallowance of unproven driveway/walkway items and a one-third betterment deduction, plus costs, resulting in total judgment of $10,040.32.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; Defendant ordered to pay total $10,040.32 (debt $9,860.32; costs $180.00).
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant debt $9,860.32
- Defendant to pay costs $180.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment