Petroniuk (Re)

Petroniuk (Re)

The Court concluded that, having considered the applicant's alibi (which had been before the Board), the Ontario Review Board's disposition was reasonable and the appeal must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2014 ONCA 166
Parties
Appellant: Elizabeth Petroniuk; Respondent: Attorney General of Ontario; Intervener: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Amicus: Anita Szigeti
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code / Appeal From the Ontario Review Board to the Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Review Board, Appeal, Reasonableness Standard, Alibi
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Administrative Law Review Board Appeal Reasonableness Standard Alibi

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Petroniuk

Appellant

Attorney General of Ontario

Respondent

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Intervener

Anita Szigeti

Amicus

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code / Appeal From the Ontario Review Board to the Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Ontario Review Board's disposition was reasonable
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's alibi required overturning the Board's decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Court concluded that, having considered the applicant's alibi (which had been before the Board), the Ontario Review Board's disposition was reasonable and the appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed