Clergue v. Humphrey
Appeal dismissed: a plaintiff in an action on a foreign judgment may plead the original consideration; where a promoter obtained a loan for a company not yet in existence the promoter was personally the principal debtor and therefore primarily liable on the note; the defendant's statute of limitations defence failed because the action was not barred under the applicable commencement rules.
- Citation
- (1900) 31 SCR 66
- Parties
- Defendant Appellant: Francis H. Clergue; Plaintiff Respondent (executor of David Bugbee, Deceased): Samuel F. Humphrey; Plaintiff Respondent (executor of David Bugbee, Deceased): William S. Adams
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Action on Foreign Judgment With Claim on Original Consideration / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment for plaintiffs on the promissory note affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Original Consideration, Promoter Personal Liability, Statute of Limitations, Guarantor Vs Principal Liability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis H. Clergue
Defendant Appellant
Samuel F. Humphrey
Plaintiff Respondent (executor of David Bugbee, Deceased)
William S. Adams
Plaintiff Respondent (executor of David Bugbee, Deceased)
Procedural Posture
Appeal Action on Foreign Judgment With Claim on Original Consideration / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a plaintiff in an action on a foreign judgment may include a count on the original consideration notwithstanding the Judicature Act
- 2 Whether the promoter who obtained a loan for a company not yet in existence was a mere guarantor or the principal debtor
- 3 Whether the limitation period was attracted by date of issue of the writ or date of filing the statement of claim
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal dismissed: a plaintiff in an action on a foreign judgment may plead the original consideration; where a promoter obtained a loan for a company not yet in existence the promoter was personally the principal debtor and therefore primarily liable on the note; the defendant's statute of limitations defence failed because the action was not barred under the applicable commencement rules.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment for plaintiffs on the promissory note affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judgment in favour of plaintiffs on the promissory note upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment