Thibodeau v. Thibodeau
An arbitration award directing payment of an equalization amount from the payor spouse’s share of matrimonial home sale proceeds, without an express order under s.9(1) creating a transfer, vesting, security, charge or trust, does not create a proprietary interest enforceable against the trustee in bankruptcy;...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2011 ONCA 110
- Parties
- Applicant (respondent in Appeal): Darlene Joyce Thibodeau; Respondent (appellant): Rodney Blair Thibodeau; Respondent (appellant): The Bank of Nova Scotia, as assignee of Cyril Sapiro & Co. Ltd., Trustee of the Estate of Rodney Blair Thibodeau, a bankrupt
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Superior Court Order Concerning Enforcement of Family Arbitration Award and Bankruptcy Priority / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; set aside paragraphs 5 and 7 of the May 11, 2009 order; Mr. Thibodeau’s share of the net proceeds of sale of the matrimonial home vests in the bankrupt estate to be distributed under BIA s.136; RRSP transfer order set aside
- Legal Topics
- Equalization Payments, Priority of Creditors, Equitable Trust and Equitable Assignment, S.9(1) Family Law Act Remedies, RRSP Exemption and Enforcement, Arbitration Award Enforcement
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darlene Joyce Thibodeau
Applicant (respondent in Appeal)
Rodney Blair Thibodeau
Respondent (appellant)
The Bank of Nova Scotia, as assignee of Cyril Sapiro & Co. Ltd., Trustee of the Estate of Rodney Blair Thibodeau, a bankrupt
Respondent (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Superior Court Order Concerning Enforcement of Family Arbitration Award and Bankruptcy Priority / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an arbitration award directing payment of an equalization amount from the payor spouse’s share of matrimonial home sale proceeds creates a proprietary interest (trust/charge/equitable assignment) effective against the trustee in bankruptcy
- 2 Whether the motion judge erred in ordering transfer of the bankrupt’s RRSP to the payee spouse to satisfy costs and claims
Ratio Decidendi
An arbitration award directing payment of an equalization amount from the payor spouse’s share of matrimonial home sale proceeds, without an express order under s.9(1) creating a transfer, vesting, security, charge or trust, does not create a proprietary interest enforceable against the trustee in bankruptcy; consequently the payor’s share of the proceeds vests in the bankrupt estate to be distributed under BIA s.136; the motion judge also erred in ordering transfer of the RRSP because such proprietary relief was not granted by the arbitrator and could not be grafted onto an enforcement proceeding under s.59.8 or Rule 59.06(2)(a) in the absence of proper application and justification.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; set aside paragraphs 5 and 7 of the May 11, 2009 order; Mr. Thibodeau’s share of the net proceeds of sale of the matrimonial home vests in the bankrupt estate to be distributed under BIA s.136; RRSP transfer order set aside
Orders
- Set aside paragraphs 5 and 7 of the May 11, 2009 order
- Order that Mr. Thibodeau’s share of the net proceeds of sale of the matrimonial home vest in the bankrupt estate to be distributed in accordance with s.136 of the BIA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment