McCormick Estate v. Landry

McCormick Estate v. Landry

The appeal was dismissed because the record provided sufficient evidence to support the trial judge's factual findings, credibility assessments and awards of damages, and no substantial error of fact or law was demonstrated that would justify appellate interference.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
1997 NSCA 150
Parties
Appellant: Estate of Raymond J. McCormick; Respondent: Blair T. Landry; Respondent: Debra Anne (Chiasson) Landry
Court
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 September 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Personal Injury (motor Vehicle Accident) / Appeal Heard and Judgment Delivered by Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; trial judge's awards of damages and related orders upheld
Legal Topics
Assessment of Damages, Standard of Review on Appeal, Credibility Findings, Costs on Appeal
Source Language
en
Tort Personal Injury Civil Procedure Appeal Assessment of Damages Standard of Review on Appeal Credibility Findings Costs on Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Estate of Raymond J. McCormick

Appellant

Blair T. Landry

Respondent

Debra Anne (Chiasson) Landry

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal Personal Injury (motor Vehicle Accident) / Appeal Heard and Judgment Delivered by Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in law or in the assessment of damages awarded to the respondents
  2. 2 Whether the appellate court should intervene in the trial judge's factual findings and credibility assessments
  3. 3 Proper award of costs on appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the record provided sufficient evidence to support the trial judge's factual findings, credibility assessments and awards of damages, and no substantial error of fact or law was demonstrated that would justify appellate interference.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; trial judge's awards of damages and related orders upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Trial judgment and awards totaling $143,158.74 upheld