Delaney v. McIntyre
On the balance of probabilities the defendant's PCDS responses that the only flood was the 2016 Thanksgiving event were undermined by the handwritten note on the underside of the drain cover indicating recurrent flooding when rainfall exceeded a threshold; that note, the defendant's conduct in leaving the unfinished basement, and the December 22, 2018 flooding (29.1 mm) support the finding that the defendant knew or ought to have known of a latent intermittent flooding defect and that the claimant relied on the PCDS and suffered loss. Damages are awarded but reduced for betterment (50% of a $35,000 average repair estimate) resulting in $17,500 plus costs $199.35 for total judgment...
- Citation
- 2021 NSSM 65
- Parties
- Claimant: Nicole Delaney; Defendant: Ewen MacIntyre
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court / Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Property Disclosure Statement, Latent Defect, Negligent Misrepresentation, Caveat Emptor, Betterment, Damages, Non‑suit Motion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicole Delaney
Claimant
Ewen MacIntyre
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the basement flooding constituted a latent defect
- 2 Whether the Property Condition Disclosure Statement (PCDS) was untrue or misleading
- 3 Whether the defendant knew or ought to have known about recurrent flooding
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the defendant's PCDS responses that the only flood was the 2016 Thanksgiving event were undermined by the handwritten note on the underside of the drain cover indicating recurrent flooding when rainfall exceeded a threshold; that note, the defendant's conduct in leaving the unfinished basement, and the December 22, 2018 flooding (29.1 mm) support the finding that the defendant knew or ought to have known of a latent intermittent flooding defect and that the claimant relied on the PCDS and suffered loss. Damages are awarded but reduced for betterment (50% of a $35,000 average repair estimate) resulting in $17,500 plus costs $199.35 for total judgment...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant
Orders
- Damages awarded to Claimant in the amount of $17,500.00
- Court costs awarded to Claimant in the amount of $199.35
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment