VA3-00426
On the credible weight of documentary police and court evidence, and given the claimant's extensive criminal record and the equivalence of the Washington State burglary in the 2nd degree to a Canadian offence punishable by up to ten years, there are serious reasons for considering the claimant committed a serious non-political crime; therefore the claimant is excluded from refugee protection under Article 1F(b) and section 98 of the IRPA.
- Citation
- VA3-00426
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX; Respondent/minister: Canada (Minister); Designated Representative: Ron Yamauchi
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim With Exclusion Determination / Hearing and Final Determination on Exclusion Under Article 1 F(b) / Section 98 IRPA
- Outcome
- Claimant excluded from refugee protection under Article 1F(b) of the UN Convention and section 98 of the IRPA.
- Legal Topics
- Exclusion, Article 1 F(b), Serious Non Political Crime, Burglary, Credibility, Internal Flight Alternative, Previous Claim, Article 1 E, IRPA S.98, Inadmissibility S.36
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
Canada (Minister)
Respondent/minister
Ron Yamauchi
Designated Representative
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim With Exclusion Determination / Hearing and Final Determination on Exclusion Under Article 1 F(b) / Section 98 IRPA
Legal Issues
- 1 personal identity and religion
- 2 credibility of claimant
- 3 objective basis and change of circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
On the credible weight of documentary police and court evidence, and given the claimant's extensive criminal record and the equivalence of the Washington State burglary in the 2nd degree to a Canadian offence punishable by up to ten years, there are serious reasons for considering the claimant committed a serious non-political crime; therefore the claimant is excluded from refugee protection under Article 1F(b) and section 98 of the IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claimant excluded from refugee protection under Article 1F(b) of the UN Convention and section 98 of the IRPA.
Orders
- Claimant is excluded from refugee protection under Article 1F(b) and section 98 IRPA.
- Jurisdiction shifts to the Minister for removal processing and any pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment