Capitaines Propriétaires de la Gaspésie (A.C.P.G.) Inc. v. Pêcheries Guy Laflamme Inc.
The one‑page Boat Handling contract contained an exclusion of liability that was sufficiently broad to cover negligence and to benefit the named operator; the contracting company received repeated copies of the contract and is charged with constructive notice; therefore the exclusion clause is valid, binding on Pêcheries Guy Laflamme Inc. and Guy Laflamme and available to Paulin Cotton, and the counterclaim fails.
- Citation
- 2014 FC 456
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Capitaines Propriétaires de la Gaspésie (A.C.P.G.) Inc.; Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Paulin Cotton; Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Axa Assurances Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Pêcheries Guy Laflamme Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Guy Laflamme
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty Action in Personam / Judgment on Liability; Counterclaim for Damages Dismissed
- Outcome
- Action allowed; exclusion clause upheld; counterclaim dismissed; costs to plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Exclusion Clause, Bailee Liability, Negligence, Notice of Contractual Terms, Pure Economic Loss, Stipulation for Another
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Capitaines Propriétaires de la Gaspésie (A.C.P.G.) Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Paulin Cotton
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Axa Assurances Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Pêcheries Guy Laflamme Inc.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Guy Laflamme
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Admiralty Action in Personam / Judgment on Liability; Counterclaim for Damages Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Cause of incident
- 2 Negligence of ACPG or operator Paulin Cotton
- 3 Whether exclusion clause excludes negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The one‑page Boat Handling contract contained an exclusion of liability that was sufficiently broad to cover negligence and to benefit the named operator; the contracting company received repeated copies of the contract and is charged with constructive notice; therefore the exclusion clause is valid, binding on Pêcheries Guy Laflamme Inc. and Guy Laflamme and available to Paulin Cotton, and the counterclaim fails.
Court Disposition
Action allowed; exclusion clause upheld; counterclaim dismissed; costs to plaintiffs
Orders
- The action is allowed
- The exclusion of liability clause in the contract between the parties is valid, in effect and enforceable against Pêcheries Guy Laflamme Inc. and Guy Laflamme
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment