Rustig Estate (Re)
Where wills expressly authorized the solicitor to be proctor and charge professional fees, those solicitor fees are allowable but must be reasonable and subject to taxation; executor commission under s.76 applies only to amounts actually 'received' by the executor (direct devises are excluded); commissions must be assessed by reference to size, responsibility, time and skill, and advances of executor commission require court approval. Applying these principles, the court reduced some claimed proctor fees and fixed commissions at 2.5% on assets received in the Rustig (Wolfgang) estate and 3% on the received portion of the Eveline estate, producing the specified allowed amounts.
- Citation
- 2002 NSSC 210
- Parties
- Deceased/testator: Joachim Wolfgang Rustig; Deceased/testatrix/executrix: Eveline Liselotte Rustig; Executor and Solicitor: David A. Grant
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Probate (court of Probate, Supreme Court of Nova Scotia) / Decision on Assessment of Solicitor Fees, Proctor Fees and Executor Commissions
- Outcome
- Applicant's accounts allowed in part; specific reductions and commissions fixed; net balance payable to applicant calculated.
- Legal Topics
- Executor Commission, Solicitor Fees, Proctor Fees, Taxation of Costs, Advances From Estate
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joachim Wolfgang Rustig
Deceased/testator
Eveline Liselotte Rustig
Deceased/testatrix/executrix
David A. Grant
Executor and Solicitor
Procedural Posture
Probate (court of Probate, Supreme Court of Nova Scotia) / Decision on Assessment of Solicitor Fees, Proctor Fees and Executor Commissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate solicitor/proctor remuneration for services to Joachim Wolfgang Rustig estate
- 2 Appropriate solicitor/proctor remuneration for services to Eveline Liselotte Rustig estate
- 3 Appropriate executor commission for David A. Grant re Joachim Wolfgang Rustig estate
Ratio Decidendi
Where wills expressly authorized the solicitor to be proctor and charge professional fees, those solicitor fees are allowable but must be reasonable and subject to taxation; executor commission under s.76 applies only to amounts actually 'received' by the executor (direct devises are excluded); commissions must be assessed by reference to size, responsibility, time and skill, and advances of executor commission require court approval. Applying these principles, the court reduced some claimed proctor fees and fixed commissions at 2.5% on assets received in the Rustig (Wolfgang) estate and 3% on the received portion of the Eveline estate, producing the specified allowed amounts.
Court Disposition
Applicant's accounts allowed in part; specific reductions and commissions fixed; net balance payable to applicant calculated.
Orders
- Allowed legal fees and solicitor/proctor work and HST resulting in total legal fees and commission fixed at $59,013.82 CAD.
- Deducted previously paid amount of $43,669.17 CAD (57 invoices paid).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment