Darling v. Brown
The Court held that under Civil Code Art. 913 joint executors are liable only for the property they took into possession in their joint capacity, so the larger balance shown in the firm's books was the responsibility of William Darling Jun. alone; regular merchant book entries and annual accountings constituted proof of the debt; the claim against executors is subject to the long prescription (30 years) and, absent proof of a higher interest rate realized, interest awarded to legatees must be reduced from 7% to 6% and run from the date of demand (11 August 1871).
- Citation
- (1877) 2 SCR 26
- Parties
- Appellants (executors of the Will of William Darling): William Darling and others; Respondents (executors/trustees Under the Will of George Templeton, Representing Legatee Isabella Darling): Robert Brown and others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 1877
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Concerning Estates and Executors' Account (débat De Compte) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench (quebec) (appeal Side) and Superior Court Judgment Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; lower court judgment confirmed subject to modifications regarding executors' joint liability and interest
- Legal Topics
- Executor Liability, Joint and Several Liability, Débat De Compte (accounting), Interest on Estate Funds, Merchant Books as Evidence, Prescription Periods
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Darling and others
Appellants (executors of the Will of William Darling)
Robert Brown and others
Respondents (executors/trustees Under the Will of George Templeton, Representing Legatee Isabella Darling)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Concerning Estates and Executors' Account (débat De Compte) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of Queen's Bench (quebec) (appeal Side) and Superior Court Judgment Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the firm or William Darling Jun. owed the estate a sum shown in firm books
- 2 Whether executors are liable in the action for sums they did not personally receive
- 3 Whether respondents could rely on firm indebtedness and merchant book entries against executors
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that under Civil Code Art. 913 joint executors are liable only for the property they took into possession in their joint capacity, so the larger balance shown in the firm's books was the responsibility of William Darling Jun. alone; regular merchant book entries and annual accountings constituted proof of the debt; the claim against executors is subject to the long prescription (30 years) and, absent proof of a higher interest rate realized, interest awarded to legatees must be reduced from 7% to 6% and run from the date of demand (11 August 1871).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; lower court judgment confirmed subject to modifications regarding executors' joint liability and interest
Orders
- Judgment of Superior Court and Court of Queen's Bench confirmed except as modified by Supreme Court
- Executors are not jointly and severally liable for the whole balance; each is liable only for the share of property they took possession of in their joint capacity (per Civil Code Art. 913)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment