Export Development Canada v. Suncor Energy Inc.
The Federal Court has statutory jurisdiction under the CAA/Code and FCA to appoint an arbitrator pursuant to the Policy; the subsidiaries are properly named and affected by the appointment and therefore remain parties to the appointment application but the Court must not decide arbitrator jurisdiction over them; selection criteria must be assessed holistically with highest priority given to qualifications and experience in Ontario/Canadian law and to independence and impartiality; applying those criteria the court appointed John Judge as sole arbitrator based on his substantial Ontario law experience and extensive arbitration track record.
- Citation
- 2023 FC 1050
- Parties
- Applicant: Export Development Canada; Respondent: Suncor Energy Inc.; Respondent: Suncor Energy Oil (North Africa) GmbH; Respondent: Suncor Energy En Naga Limited; Respondent: Suncor Energy Libya Exploration B.V.; Respondent: Suncor Energy Ventures (North Africa) Limited
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Appoint Arbitrator Under Arbitration Clause / Order and Reasons Following Appointment Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: Court appoints sole arbitrator and denies removal of subsidiaries as parties to the appointment proceeding
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Arbitrator, Jurisdiction of Courts to Appoint Arbitrator, Competence Competence, Joinder of Subsidiaries, Oppression Remedy (cbca), Recovery/subrogation Rights, Conflict of Interest and Disclosures
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Export Development Canada
Applicant
Suncor Energy Inc.
Respondent
Suncor Energy Oil (North Africa) GmbH
Respondent
Suncor Energy En Naga Limited
Respondent
Suncor Energy Libya Exploration B.V.
Respondent
Suncor Energy Ventures (North Africa) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Appoint Arbitrator Under Arbitration Clause / Order and Reasons Following Appointment Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction to appoint a sole arbitrator under the Policy and applicable statutes?
- 2 Should the named subsidiaries be removed as parties to the appointment application or should the order be limited in scope?
- 3 Are there evidentiary defects in EDC's affidavits and cross-examinations affecting the appointment?
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court has statutory jurisdiction under the CAA/Code and FCA to appoint an arbitrator pursuant to the Policy; the subsidiaries are properly named and affected by the appointment and therefore remain parties to the appointment application but the Court must not decide arbitrator jurisdiction over them; selection criteria must be assessed holistically with highest priority given to qualifications and experience in Ontario/Canadian law and to independence and impartiality; applying those criteria the court appointed John Judge as sole arbitrator based on his substantial Ontario law experience and extensive arbitration track record.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: Court appoints sole arbitrator and denies removal of subsidiaries as parties to the appointment proceeding
Orders
- The Subsidiaries' request to be removed as parties to this application is denied.
- John Judge is appointed as sole arbitrator for the Second Arbitration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment