Industrial Incomes Limited v. Maralta Oil Company Limited
The written assignments and express instruction to deposit and distribute proceeds in a separate bank account, first to drilling costs and then to creditors up to a fixed aggregate, created an enforceable express trust; the assignee held funds as trustee and was liable for failure to account and for unpaid creditors, and set-offs for payments and purchases of claims are allowable only to the extent actually paid.
- Citation
- [1968] SCR 822
- Parties
- Plaintiff Respondent: Maralta Oil Co. Ltd.; Defendant Appellant: Industrial Incomes Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (trusts) / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Express Trust, Trust for Creditors, Mechanics' Lien, Assignment of Proceeds, Separate Bank Account, Set Off
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maralta Oil Co. Ltd.
Plaintiff Respondent
Industrial Incomes Limited
Defendant Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (trusts) / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From Supreme Court of Alberta, Appellate Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the assignment of a 30% interest in net production created an express trust enforceable by the beneficiary or creditors
- 2 Whether a purported trust for creditors is enforceable absent notice or assent by the creditors
- 3 Whether the assignee’s failure to keep a separate account defeated the trust or entitled it to treat funds as its own
Ratio Decidendi
The written assignments and express instruction to deposit and distribute proceeds in a separate bank account, first to drilling costs and then to creditors up to a fixed aggregate, created an enforceable express trust; the assignee held funds as trustee and was liable for failure to account and for unpaid creditors, and set-offs for payments and purchases of claims are allowable only to the extent actually paid.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Judgment for respondent in amount 19781.70
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment